What is the Cold War Compensation Act
Beryllium Exposure
“The Cold War Compensation Act,” The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA), is the first federal workers’ compensation program to be implemented in the last twenty years. The benefit program is offered to beryllium workers amounts to a federal bailout of a monopolistic private industry that has hidden behind the cloak of national security and has endangered the lives of workers, their household contacts, and innocent bystanders.
BERYLLIUM
Beryllium is a rare, lightweight metal that was discovered in 1798. It is the 32nd most abundant element and makes up approximately 0.005 percent of the earth’s crust. Most of the world’s beryllium is mined in African and South American countries. The United States is the world’s largest consumer. The metal is stronger than steel and lighter than aluminum and has been a critical component of the U.S. nuclear arsenal since the dawn of the atomic age. It is also used in products that range from sporting goods to dental alloys.
Inhalation of the microscopic metal particles into the lungs as very small concentrations of beryllium dust or fumes can result in a myriad of serious, latent, progressive, and critical health conditions such as beryllium sensitization, chronic beryllium disease (CBD), skin disease and cancer. These conditions are treatable but not curable. The symptoms may occur from 30 days to 30 years after exposure. CBD develops in workers who have been sensitized to beryllium and may occur at any time during or following exposure. It has been recognized that between 2% and 17% of workers exposed to beryllium dust develop allergic sensitization. Beryllium sensitization may be detected by a beryllium lymphocyte proliferation blood test (BeLPT). Common symptoms of CBD are cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, weight loss, loss of appetite, fever, or night sweats. Acute Beryllium disease (ABD) results in symptoms similar to pneumonia or bronchitis. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization has concluded that beryllium can cause human cancer.
In his farewell address to America in 1961, President Eisenhower’s warning against the economic and political alliance of the vast “military-industrial complex” was a forecast of the dangers to workers in the years ahead. During the 1940s and throughout the cold war, the beryllium business became a vital part of the American economy. To produce and maintain its nuclear arsenal, the US ended up supporting the exclusive beryllium production by Brush Wellman, Inc. Since 1949, it has been estimated that the US government purchased $1 billion worth of beryllium for its nuclear weapons and weapons-related programs involving more than 600,000 workers. To maintain an accessible supply of this metal, the government and industry allegedly made secret deals to prohibit enactment and enforcement of strict OSHA guidelines, which would have reduced exposure and the resulting disease.
STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS INEFFECTIVE
As workers fell ill, State workers’ compensation programs became an ineffective remedy for the injured employees. A few jurisdictions recognized the disease as compensable. Biglioli v Durotest Corporation, 26 N.J. 33, 138 A.2d 529 (N.J. 1958). Some compensation claims were barred by the statute of limitations; others offered minimal benefits due to low wages, which set reduced benefit rates; delays in receiving emergent medical care also made prosecution a futile effort. State v. Lemke v. Brush Wellman, Inc., 84 Ohio St.3d 161, 702 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio 1998), Dean v. Atlantic Research Corporation, 1997 WL 221553 (Va. App. 1997). Civilians employed by Federal agencies were met with a strict defense of the denial of causation. They were additionally hindered by the Federal government’s classification of documents under the veil of national security, making the proof of exposure impossible.
CLASS ACTIONS
Litigants began to look for alternate means of recovery against the nuclear contractors who produced and used beryllium. Class action lawsuits were filed on behalf of the former workers. Pohl v. NGK Metal Corporation, et al, 117 F. Supp.2d 474 (E.D. Penn. 2000) and Levell v. Monsanto Research Corp., 191 F.R.D. 543 (S.D. Ohio 2000). Employees also attempted to challenge the “exclusivity rule” and sue the employer under the theory of an intentional tort. Kane v. Durotest Corporation, 37 N.J. 552, 182 A.2d 559 (N.J. 1962), Norgard v. Brush Wellman, Inc., 2000 WL 1715025 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 2000). There was also an ill-fated attempt to hold the US government vicariously liable. Dyer v. United States, 96 F. Supp.2d 725 (E.D. Tenn. 2000).
INVESTIGATIONS
During the 1990s, the plight of the beryllium workers and the litigation threat to the industry began to glow in the spotlight of public attention. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) issued a report to Congress in September 1995, which recognized beryllium as an identified hazard to employees and incidents of workers’ home contamination. In March of 1999 The Toledo Blade published a 3 part the Pulitzer Prize series, “Deadly Alliance: How the government chose weapons over workers.” In September 1999, the issue was highlighted again when the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued an Alert to workers exposed to beryllium.
FEDERAL POLICY CHANGES
Finally, Federal policy changed. In April 2000, Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, announced that the Clinton/Gore Administration would reverse its past policy of denial of liability to the injured beryllium workers and endorsed the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) (P.L.106-398) which was enacted into law in October 2000 with strong bipartisan support. EEOICPA establishes a program to compensate employers of the Department of Energy (DOE), its contractors and subcontractors, companies that provided beryllium to DOE, and atomic weapons employers. An atomic weapons employer is defined by EEOICPA as a private company that processes material that emits radiation and is used in the production of atomic weapons.
President Clinton issued an Executive Order on December 7, 2000 recognizing that existing workers’ compensation programs have failed to provide for the needs of the injured beryllium workers and their families. The President stated that this serious problem was complicated by the fact that the DOE and its predecessors encouraged and assisted the DOE contractors in opposing the claims of workers who sought benefits.
The President directed the Federal government to assist workers in obtaining benefits by providing all pertinent and available information necessary for evaluating and processing the claims. Clinton ordered that this was to be accomplished in a manner that would ease the administrative burden upon the injured workers and their survivors, respecting their dignity and privacy.
In January 2001, the Clinton administration proposed amendments to EEOICPA, which would permit the injured workers to elect a lump sum benefit in the amount of $150,000.00 as provided in the current law or compensation for lost wages provided for by the new legislation. The concept of compensation for lost wages is a traditional remedy for workers’ compensation under both Federal and State systems. The payment of medical expenses is provided for under both the current legislation and the new proposals.
The President established an Interagency Working Group composed of representatives from the Office of Management and Budget, The National Economic Council, and the Departments of Labor, Energy, Health and Human Services, and Justice. The Secretary of Labor will have primary responsibility for administering the program and developing the necessary paper and electronic forms to process claims. The Secretary of Health and Human Services will promulgate regulations no later than May 31, 2001, to establish guidelines to determine whether a cancer is causally related to exposure and to establish a method to estimate radiation doses. The Secretary of Energy and the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health will provide technical assistance and information to identify and notify potentially eligible individuals of the availability of compensation benefits. The Department of Energy has reviewed its records for the past 60 years and has published a list of 317 sites that employed more than half a million people in 37 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rice and the Marshall Islands. The Attorney General has been responsible for developing procedures to notify potential claimants. An Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health composed of 20 members who represent the scientific and medical communities will assist the Secretary of Health and Human Services in establishing further guidelines.
CONCLUSION
While the Federal government has recognized the need for a fair and timely compensation program for the energy workers who have sacrificed their health to build the nation’s nuclear defenses, the issue remains whether the program will be administered in a remedial fashion and whether it is simply 40 years too late. Do EEOICPA and the proposals that followed merely shift responsibility from the private sector to the government at the expense of the lives of this country’s energy workers who helped win the cold war but may never enjoy the peace that followed?
...
The author, Jon L. Gelman, practices law in Wayne, NJ. He is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters). For over five decades, the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have represented injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Recommended Citation: Gelman, Jon L., What is the Cold War Compensation Act, www.gelmans.com (2001), 163 N.J.L.J.844 (February 26, 2001)
https://www.gelmans.com/ReadingRoom/tabid/65/ArtMID/1482/ArticleID/884/preview/true/Default.aspx
© 2001-2023 Jon L Gelman. All rights reserved.
Attorney Advertising
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Disclaimer
Download Adobe Reader
More links
-
U.S. Locations Where Beryllium Was Used or Detected (25-MAY-01This report identifies U.S. locations where beryllium was used in workplace processes or detected as present in the workplace. Data show that beryllium was used or detected at locations in 45 of 50 states, plus the District of Columbia. However, the number of locations varied by state. For example, 30 states and the District of Columbia were reported as having from one to 10 locations, while 15 states were reported as having from 11 to 41 locations. The states without reported beryllium u
-
Department of Energy Covered Facilities DatabaseThe Department of Energy has created this DOE Covered Facilities database to provide public access to summaries of information collected on the facilities listed in the Federal Register. A covered facility may have multiple designations and the responsibility for designation is delegated to either DOE, DOL or NIOSH. The time period for a covered facility may vary depending on the type of covered activities.
-
Radiation Exposure Compensation ActActThe Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (“the Act” or “RECA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2210 note, established an administrative program for claims relating to atmospheric nuclear testing and uranium industry employment. The Act delegated authority to the Attorney General to establish procedures and make determinations regarding whether claims satisfy statutory eligibility criteria.
-
NIOSH Radiation Dose Reconstruction ProgramDivision of Compensation Analysis and Support (DCAS) NIOSH created DCAS in 2001 to estimate work related radiation exposure (dose reconstruction) for certain workers with cancer who filed claims under Part B of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (the Act/EEOICPA). Part B is a portion of the Act that provides compensation of $150,000 and medical benefits to employees (or their survivors) for illness caused by exposure to radiation, beryllium, ....
-
NIOSH Radiation Dose Reconstruction ProgramThe Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (the Act or EEOICPA; 42 U.S.C. 7384 et seq.)[207 KB (35 pages)] provides compensation and medical benefits to eligible workers (or certain survivors if the worker is deceased) for illnesses related to exposure to radiation or other toxic substances while employed at Department of Energy (DOE), its contractor, or subcontractor facilities. The Act was passed on October 30, 2000, and became effective on July 31, 2001.
-
EEOICPA Work Site InformationInformationSearchable database of EEOICPA worksites.
-
About the Energy Workers Program - US Department of LaborThe mission, under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA), is to protect the interests of workers who were injured or became ill on the job, or their families, by making timely, appropriate, and accurate decisions on claims and providing prompt payment of benefits to eligible claimants.
-
Public Reading Room - US DOL Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC)The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires that every federal agency, component or program establish a public “electronic reading room” where information may be provided to the public which: the agency determines has become or is likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records; or contain records which have already been disclosed,
-
EEOICP News Archive - Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC)News articles posted by the Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC)
-
EEOICP Case Law Search - Google Scholar
-
Workers’ Compensation Benefits for Occupational Exposure to Cellphone RadiationThe controversy over cellphone use and illness and disease is ongoing. It is a debate that mirrors such exposures as asbestos, tobacco, opioid use, and artificial sweeteners. In those cases, the US regulatory agencies reversed their opinions as more scientific research became readily available, and a torrent of litigation ensued. For now, as in the past, the workers’ compensation system will assume the role of the decision-maker in this ongoing argument over safety in the workplace.