Johnson & Johnson continues to be hit with verdicts in cancer cases flowing from exposure to its baby powder that contained talc.
A recent $72 Million verdict awarded to the family of a woman who died of ovarian cancer and had used Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder containing talc has resulted in over 4,000 lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Johnson & Johnson was negligent in not warning consumers that talc was a cancer causing substance. Baby Powder is considered a cosmetic and not subject to regulation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Talc is a soft mineral like asbestos, a known carcinogen. Talc has been associated with mesothelioma, a fatal and rare cancer.
Bloomberg News reported the increase in lawsuits against Johnson and Johnson:
“More than 1,000 women and their families are suing J&J and Imerys [ a talc supplier], claiming the companies have known of the association with ovarian cancer for years and failed to warn them. The next trial is scheduled to begin on April 11 in a St. Louis circuit court. ‘Whether or not the science indicates that Baby Powder is a cause of ovarian cancer, Johnson & Johnson has a very significant breach of trust,’ says Julie Hennessy, a marketing professor at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management. ‘In trying to protect this one business, they’ve put the whole J&J brand at risk.’”
“Johnson & Johnson has a Baby Powder problem, More than 100 Women Are Suing the Company for Covering Up A Cancer Risk."
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 email@example.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered asbestos related exposures and illnesses.
Johnson & Johson hit with $25.7M verdict in baby powder cancer case 5/25/18
Johnson & Johnson Hammered Agin in Talc-Asbestos Verdict of $70 Million 10/27/16
Lawsuits Over Baby Powder Raise Questions About Cancer Risk 5/23/16
Another Big Defeat for Johnson & Johnson in Talc-Ovarian Cancer Case 5/2/16
Johnson & Johnson Loses Second Ovarian Cancer Case, Must Pay $55 Milliion Reuters 5/3/16
J&J Faces 1,000 More Talc-Cancer Lawsuits After Verdict Lost Bloomberg 5/2/16
J&J Must Pay $72 Million Over Talc Tied to Woman's Cancer Bloomberg 2/23/16
Mesothelioma Award for Household Contact of Talc Worker Upheld ...
Mar 28, 2015 ... A $1.6 Million award for a household contact of an asbestos worker was affirmed by a NJ Court of Appeals. The child of a Shulton employee ...
BASF Must Face Asbestos Coverup Fraud ...
Sep 6, 2014 ... BASF SE (BAS), the world's biggest chemical maker, was ordered to face claims it fraudulently hid evidence that its talc products contained ...
Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Suit alleges ...
Nov 21, 2014 ... However, talcum powder—also known as baby powder, body powder and talc— has been shown to migrate to the ovaries when used around ...
Jury weighs talcum powder-cancer link
Oct 4, 2013 ... Talc has been considered a potentially carcinogenic substance.T A jury has been asked to decide ...
Asbestos Ban Recommended by US Geological Survey
April 21, 2003 The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) calls asbestos “a commercial designation for any mineral products composed of strong and flexible fibers, resistant to heat, corrosion, abrasion, and that can be woven.” Despite all of these remarkable properties, known since the time of Aristotle, controversy has followed asbestos due to numerous and well-documented adverse health effects. Various federal and state agencies and private sector organizations grapple with continuing public health concerns, such as the legacy of the Libby, Montana vermiculite mine, possible asbestos risks from the World Trade Center collapse and other related issues. They also continue to address current developments regarding the safety and efficacy of substitutes.
IARC To Review Human Carcinogens-metals, arsenic, dusts & fibers
May 17, 2009 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has met to reassess the carcinogenicity of metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres previously classified as “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1) and to identify additional tumour sites and mechanisms of carcinogenesis.
It reported that 125 million workers continue to be exposed to asbestos in the workplace. Lancet reports:
"Globally, an estimated 125 million people are still exposed to asbestos in the workplace.2 Although asbestos has been banned or restricted in most of the industrialised world, its use is increasing in parts of Asia, South America, and the former Soviet Union. Naturally occurring sources of asbestos, its use in brake linings, and deterioration of asbestos-containing products all contribute to environmental exposure worldwide. Exposure may also come from fibres carried home on the clothing of asbestos workers….
Prospective Study of Talc Use and Ovarian Cancer 12/2/99
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst (2000) 92(3): 249-252 doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.249